Does the
title sound like a stupid question to you? After all, a narrator is the one who
narrates. And according to the modern "show, don't tell" fashion the
narrator should be as invisible as possible. - Why? Because, as avid supporters
of the "show, don't tell" philosophy seem to believe, the modern
reader is too stupid to deal with the specifics of prose, since they're so
different from what he's used to from movies.
Please don't
get me wrong: I'm not against "show, don't tell" in general.
Moreover, often this is what I wish beginners would do. In many cases the
advice "show, don't tell" is appropriate. - But! A novel is not
a movie. There are things it can't do while a movie can. And there are many
things it can do while a movie can't.
As
stated in a former post,
the main difference between prose and other narrative art genres is the
existence of a narrator. So what's so special about him?